Some advisers have been looking for to speak Trump out of signing the letter.
Bannon was charged with contempt of Congress in November 2021 for refusing to adjust to the subpoena. A trial on these costs is scheduled to start July 18, though Bannon has sought to delay the proceedings.
The committee has argued that claims of govt privilege are usually not legitimate for Bannon, who was a personal citizen on the time of Jan. 6, 2021. The committee has additionally mentioned that Bannon, an outspoken advocate of false claims that the 2020 election was stolen, was required to reply to the subpoena ultimately — citing claims of privilege on a question-by-question foundation as an alternative of by refusing to reply.
“Even when your consumer had been a senior aide to the President in the course of the time interval coated by the contemplated testimony, which he was most assuredly not, he’s not permitted by regulation to the kind of immunity you counsel that Mr. Trump has requested he assert,” Chairman Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.) wrote to Bannon’s legal professional in October.
The federal government has declined to convey contempt costs towards different former Trump aides who’ve additionally cited govt privilege, together with former Chief of Workers Mark Meadows and former adviser Dan Scavino.
An legal professional for Bannon and a spokesperson for Trump didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
For the reason that bombshell testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson, a former high aide to Meadows, a number of Republicans have come ahead to cooperate with the Home choose committee and extra are anticipated to proceed coming ahead, based on folks acquainted with the investigation, who spoke on the situation of anonymity due to the matter’s sensitivity.
The stay and videotaped testimony featured within the committee’s case towards Trump has to this point painted an in depth image of the previous president’s efforts to carry on to energy in any respect prices. These public hearings might now proceed into August and past as investigators accumulate extra proof and new witness testimony, the folks acquainted with the investigation added.
On Friday, former White Home counsel Pat Cipollone appeared for an eight-hour, closed-door, transcribed interview with investigators to debate his function in attempting to forestall Trump’s makes an attempt to overturn the outcomes of the 2020 election.
Cipollone might have supplied the committee with solutions to essential questions that might corroborate earlier testimony or present new proof about what he might have witnessed within the White Home within the lead-up to Jan. 6 and on the day of the assault.
“Mr. Cipollone did seem voluntarily and answered a complete number of questions,” mentioned committee member Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.). “He didn’t contradict the testimony of different witnesses and I believe we did be taught a couple of issues which we will likely be rolling out within the hearings to come back. It was a grueling day for all concerned. … However it was properly price it.”
Lofgren described Cipollone as “cautious” and “candid” in his testimony, including that new data and “extra perception into the precise day” of Jan. 6 was gleaned.
Hutchinson’s testimony recognized Cipollone as a key witness to potential felony exercise within the Trump White Home.
Hutchinson testified that, on the morning of Jan. 6, Cipollone got here ahead with an pressing request, saying “one thing to the impact of: ‘Please be certain we do not go as much as the Capitol, Cassidy. Be in contact with me. We’ll get charged with each crime conceivable if we make that motion occur.’”
She additionally testified that when the violence broke out on the Capitol, Cipollone demanded that he and Meadows communicate with Trump to intervene and attempt to cease the violence. When Meadows advised Cipollone that Trump didn’t wish to take any motion, Cipollone replied that “one thing must be achieved, or individuals are going to die, the blood’s going to be in your f-ing palms,” based on Hutchinson’s retelling of the interplay.
Stewart Rhodes, the chief of the far-right militia group the Oath Keepers, made a suggestion to the Home committee on Friday to look earlier than the committee, his legal professional Lee Vivid confirmed.
The committee has not responded to the provide. Rhodes requested his testimony be carried out below sure situations: an open discussion board, taped from a venue apart from the jail the place he’s at present in custody, and unedited. Vivid mentioned his consumer is prepared to speak about Oath Keeper actions throughout the final election and on Jan. 6, 2021.
Isaac Arnsdorf and Rosalind S. Helderman contributed to this report.